The Real Cost of Homosexual Marriage


(Note: I dug this out of my archives, and thought it still quite relevant. – Brad)

By now you have heard all the arguments for and against homosexual marriage. What’s not being pointed out is a not very obvious outcome. In fact, this is the real agenda behind this "movement", and the funny thing is that 99% of the homo and hetero populace are unaware of it.
What is being perpetrated against the American public are the same techniques observed by the journalist Edward Hunter, and used by Communists during the 1950’s and 60’s in wars around the globe:

"I see, primarily, as part of this softening up process in America, the liquidation of our attitudes on what we used to recognize as right and wrong, what we used to accept as absolute moral standardsWe now confuse moral standards with the sophistication of dialectical materialism, with a Communist crackpot theology which teaches that everything changes, and that what is right or wrong, good or bad, changes as well. So nothing they say is really good or bad. There is no such thing as truth or a lie; and any belief we actually held was simply your being unsophisticated.  They don’t say this in so many words, except to those who are already indoctrinated in communism."[1]

Only now the Globalists have subsumed the goals of Communism, and this is just one more nail in the coffin of American individuality and freedom. Certainly UNESCO sees it that way:

"The challenge to humanity is to adopt new ways of thinking, new ways of acting, new ways of organizing itself in society, in short, new ways of living."[2]

Ultimately, the goal planned for America is that she will be absorbed into the global collective; our language, borders, and culture (as Michael Savage is fond of saying) a mere historical footnote, but that’s in the long term.

In the short term, here’s how I see it playing out:

  • Once marriage between homosexuals becomes recognized by the State, the homosexual has been granted Protected Class status[3]. By Protected Class status, I don’t mean just laws prohibiting discrimination based on “sexual orientation”, but law explicitly giving special “rights” and “recognition”.  Why “special”? Because currently the homosexual has the same rights as everyone else: The right to marry someone of the opposite sex.

  • With legal status, homosexuals can now be re-classified as a protected minority, and you can bet that will be one of the first bills introduced by Barney Frank, or one of his liberal ilk.

Obviously anyone can claim to be homosexual, but the marriage certificate becomes the legal ID proving that you are now an official member of the new protected minority – with all the privileges and benefits now proffered to Blacks, Hispanics and other minorities. According to a Policy Analysis by Tony Marco this will compromise the goals of current civil rights laws.

“Since civil rights law pertaining to suspect or protected class status was first enacted, it has involved, as it were, temporary abridgements of fundamental Constitutional rights, such as that of free association, to ensure that classes of people who have been demonstrably persecuted or oppressed by society, leaving them disadvantaged and politically powerless, based on non-behavioral characteristics over which they have no control are not excluded from full participation in society.

Presumably, when these protected classes have been "made whole," to use civil rights terminology, and these classes achieve parity of opportunity and status relative to society at large, these special protections will no longer be needed. Gays as an entire class cannot prove a need for suspect or protected class status. To arbitrarily introduce into suspect status groups far more advantaged than America’s people-at-large would surely defeat the purpose and intent of civil rights laws as they have always been conceived and enforced, and injure the interests of legitimately qualifying protected classes.”[4]

Ask yourself this: Has any minority group ever been removed from the list of Protected Minorities? Ever? For a little over one year, Liberals complain that George Bush has no exit strategy from Iraq, but in the last 40 years, have the Liberals ever suggested an exit strategy for removing minorities from the lists of Protected Minority Status? Of course they haven’t. Why? Minorities have a vested interest in keeping their handlers in office. By enlarging their base with the addition of homosexuals, Liberals solidify an already powerful voting block that’s financially advantaged and influential when compared to the average American. It’s not about equal rights. It’s about control. Homosexuals, like other special interest groups seeking special governmental status (and privileges), don’t recognize that they are just another pawn in the Global Power Grab.

[1] Consultation with Edward Hunter before the Committee on Un-American Activities, 1958

[2] Our Creative Diversity, UNESCO, 1995, p.11

[3] Nixon Peabody LLP Employment Law Alert

[4] Special Class Protections for Self-Alleged Gays: A Question of "Orientation" and Consequences

Copyright 2004 by Brad Slusher
http://www.siriuscoffee.com
You may copy and distribute this article, but please keep the content and copyright unchanged.

Advertisements