6 Replies to “The Gruberization of environmental policies”
Outrage over Gruber is fine, so long as you recognize that pomposity and fooling the people are normal, not highly unusual; I mean, WMDs or the bush tax cuts that were “temporary” so bush could evade CBO scoring rules…you are, if I may say so, hypocritical if you don’t have roughly equal outrage for these things to (not to mention, we make our own reality, mission accomplished, etc)
Did you even bother to read the linked article? It has little to do with Gruber, and everything to do with how destructive and politicized the EPA has become. Your rush to point out the sins of the previous administration merely reveal your political bias.
well, the TITLE and first graf are all about Gruber, are they not ? So isn’t it fair to ask why the author thinks Gruber is so important that it is the lead to his story ?
Outrage over Gruber is fine, so long as you recognize that pomposity and fooling the people are normal, not highly unusual; I mean, WMDs or the bush tax cuts that were “temporary” so bush could evade CBO scoring rules…you are, if I may say so, hypocritical if you don’t have roughly equal outrage for these things to (not to mention, we make our own reality, mission accomplished, etc)
Did you even bother to read the linked article? It has little to do with Gruber, and everything to do with how destructive and politicized the EPA has become. Your rush to point out the sins of the previous administration merely reveal your political bias.
well, the TITLE and first graf are all about Gruber, are they not ? So isn’t it fair to ask why the author thinks Gruber is so important that it is the lead to his story ?
Outrage over Gruber is fine, so long as you recognize that pomposity and fooling the people are normal, not highly unusual; I mean, WMDs or the bush tax cuts that were “temporary” so bush could evade CBO scoring rules…you are, if I may say so, hypocritical if you don’t have roughly equal outrage for these things to (not to mention, we make our own reality, mission accomplished, etc)
Did you even bother to read the linked article? It has little to do with Gruber, and everything to do with how destructive and politicized the EPA has become. Your rush to point out the sins of the previous administration merely reveal your political bias.
well, the TITLE and first graf are all about Gruber, are they not ?
So isn’t it fair to ask why the author thinks Gruber is so important that it is the lead to his story ?
Outrage over Gruber is fine, so long as you recognize that pomposity and fooling the people are normal, not highly unusual; I mean, WMDs or the bush tax cuts that were “temporary” so bush could evade CBO scoring rules…you are, if I may say so, hypocritical if you don’t have roughly equal outrage for these things to (not to mention, we make our own reality, mission accomplished, etc)
Did you even bother to read the linked article? It has little to do with Gruber, and everything to do with how destructive and politicized the EPA has become. Your rush to point out the sins of the previous administration merely reveal your political bias.
well, the TITLE and first graf are all about Gruber, are they not ?
So isn’t it fair to ask why the author thinks Gruber is so important that it is the lead to his story ?